9/11 Was an Inside Job Debate Part 1

Watch as I debate who was responsible for 9/11 and the fake war on terror. This video was shot in the winter of 2007 Footage courtesy of The Bleepin Truth Pr…


(Visited 25 times, 1 visits today)

Share This Post

49 Comments - Write a Comment

  1. To be fair to silverstein if i bought a building that had been attacked by
    terrorists before i would have insured against another attack. I know
    people are gonna say the cia were in on it but it doesnt matter because
    they said it was a terrorist attack so i dont think it strange that he
    insured against another attack.

    Reply
  2. LMAO, you comment like you don't have the faintest fucking clue.
    Chongmaster holds the same opinion as I do, and most of the US. There was
    no conspiracy, no corruption, no controlled demo, and Al Qaeda still
    demands credit for the attacks. They circulate a video with FIVE of the
    Hijackers doing their last call for Holy Jihad, and attacks on America, as
    they were about to do. Which makes your political agenda, just so much
    bullshit under the bridge.

    Reply
  3. who are these profiteering dictators? if a dictator is making a profit off
    an american false flag operation, it's because the american administration
    allows it and encourages it to happen so they can improve trade
    relationships with oil rich countries! end of story.

    Reply
  4. Its fishy that Silverstein got an insurance policy that includes terrorism
    when the buildings were attacked in 93? Some people need to get a brain and
    a grip.

    Reply
  5. You shouldn't flag people as "your enemies" just because they introduce a
    sound piece of thought. Physman2011 is absolutely correct. Just because it
    looks and smells like a pear, doesn't mean it's a pear. Could be an asian
    apple.

    Reply
  6. Same old claims zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz 9-11 twoof movement =-failure. This
    guy is a typical truth movement sheeple. Repeats the same crap over and
    over doesnt provide a shred of proof to back up a single claim.

    Reply
  7. I concur with most of what you said! Too many signs are clear that blame
    was placed so quickly without any hard facts. Lol, I got to give it to
    you–you brought up some good points and that british guy (the alleged
    smart guy) that guy couldn't see you when you called him out!

    Reply
  8. Peace brotha, I ain't know you was making big moves like that, keep doing
    your thing. The idiot that you're debating is obviously a government,
    corporate, or banker hired shill and agent so he's going to continue to
    defend the Illuminati no matter how much evidence you put on the table but
    its still good to see you make this idiot look stupid. The beast can not
    handle conscious intellectual brothas.

    Reply
  9. wellifthemediasaysit · Edit

    9/11 was an inside job for about 70 reasons, 1 reason alone can be
    considered coincidence, 2 is suspicious, 3 is? inside job, 4 is a blatant
    inside job, but 70??? conspiracies happen, this was one of them, mass
    murder for personal gain! Oil, opium and bases in the middle east, better
    to take from the weak before other superpowers (russia, china) do! We may
    benefit in the long run when we fill up our cars, but it doesn't make 9.11
    ok! Mass murder! the shills will attack me but i don't care!

    Reply
  10. Everything that draws away from the number of wild coincidences of 9/11 is
    disinformation. Getting ppl to focus solely on the towers is a great way to
    avoid all the other nonsense of that day. Why not focus on the 911 pentagon
    tapes, or the simulatanious training of the exact event that were taking
    place that day. Much more effective in proving the point dont you agree?

    Reply
  11. Just the type of narrow minded reaction I would expect from a "truther".
    Anyone who disagrees must work for the government. A perfect example of
    poor analytical thinking skills. Thanks for the demonstration 🙂

    Reply
  12. @yahsoldier1 You are the one who comes off looking logical, very well done
    my friend. Apparantly de-classified information is "not evidence," and he
    wants us to take him serious. The only thing these so-called debunkers
    manage to do is re-inforce our beliefs. They come up with some of the most
    ridiculous straw man arguments ever.

    Reply
  13. This is a poor debate, people who are talking shite. Better debates are
    between Mark Roberts and Richard Gage or James Fetzer, or Jim Meigs and the
    Loose Change creators. These guys are just trying to get in a fight and
    half their facts are clearly poorly researched

    Reply
  14. Dr. James Millette of MVA Scientific Consultants WTC Dust Study 2/28/2012
    "The red/gray chips found in the WTC dust at four sites in New York City
    are consistent with a carbon steel coated with an epoxy resin that contains
    primarily iron oxide and kaolin clay pigments." "There is no evidence of
    individual elemental aluminum particles of any size in the red/gray chips,
    therefore the red layer of the red/gray chips is not thermite or
    nanothermite." 911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!

    Reply
  15. The simple minded argument that whoever benefits most is the perpetrator
    sounds clever and insightful but any rational twelve year old can see it
    just doesn't hold water. Even in the most horrific events someone
    indirectly benefits…the knee jerk reaction that they must hav been
    involved is lazy at best. As chompsky himself pointed out dictators around
    the world benefited from 9/11….does that mean they were in on it?

    Reply
  16. Calling out grammar,no surprise. There was also tons of firemen and police
    officers who said they heard and felt explosions. And your damn right I
    think the government would bring it down, especially if the latter is
    physically im-fucking-possible. The Gulf of Tonkan incident set the U.S.
    into the Vietnam war and guess what? It didn't happen! they've openly
    admitted. Guess what this is called kid, a false flag operation. There have
    been countless wars started by this, and it wasn't for no reason

    Reply

Post Comment